Is spying News of the World

British tabloid News of the World are fighting on the side of the hacking victims and their lawyers hired a private detective, detective had.

Former police officer Derek's website was the victim of hacking the phone Doulr Mark Lewis's lawyer had secretly made a video.
According to BBC, the detection was done so that it can be proved that Lewis had a relationship with another lawyer Sharlot Harris who were fighting for the victims of the hacking. The monitor was last year.
Hacking is the turning point in this allegation of espionage scandal. Because of this scandal, Rupert Murdoch, the tabloid News of the World "was the last to close in July.
Derek told the BBC that the tabloid website for the job he was appointed in lieu of payment. For this work he was sent to Manchester.
Murdoch to charge a statement on behalf of the newspaper has not closed.

India to revenge seized Series

Mohali. Aajinkya Rahane [91] After the brilliant batting captain Dhoni [35] and Ravindra Jadeja [26] was the final overs with unbeaten 65-run partnership helped India win the third ODI series in England, not only the five-wicket win but was captured in England, also took revenge for defeats.

Rahane missed century by nine runs Parthiv Patel [38] with 79 runs after Gautam Gambhir [58] with a century stand of 111 runs. The Dhoni, unbeaten partnership of 65 runs with Jadeja at a critical stage four balls in 49.2 overs by 300 runs losing five wickets for India achieved the target. Dhoni 50 overs, Tim Bresnan with a series of four consecutive balls sealing. Prior to the Jonathan Trott [98 not out, 116 balls, 8 ball] in addition to Samit Patel [unbeaten 70, 43 balls, 7 hits and 2 runs] and Kevin Pietersen [64 runs, 61 balls] filed by the England 50-over half succeeded in making 298 runs for four wickets. Trott with the Peterson-run unbeaten partnership of 103 with 101 runs and Patel played. Praveen from India, Vinay, Virat Kohli and Ravindra Jadeja took a - took a wicket. In the five-match series 3-0 over the visiting team has an unassailable lead.
India openers Patel in response to challenging targets and Rahane was the smart start. According to two runs per over five runs for the first wicket partnership of 79 runs. Patel scored 38 from 46 balls with three fours. Patel Bresnan lbw turned off. The grave of the boundaries of the beginning of your shift. The second half of Rahane completed his career in 59 balls. Serious, too smart to bat 31 overs, hitting a six off Graeme Swann fourth in the series completed its second consecutive Pchasa. Easy to play both for the second wicket partnership of 111 runs. Meanwhile, Steven Finn out caught by Gambhir at a slower ball broke the partnership. Gambhir, three fours and one six from 60 balls 58 runs. Rahane century towards the other end also lost his temper and Finn caught sitting on the ball to Alastair Cook. He missed just nine of its first century. These two successes in England's bowlers started putting pressure on the Indian batsmen. Rahane batting power play than in India lost the wicket of Suresh Raina. Raina could not even open an account. Virat Kohli, who has scored centuries in the match at the other end [35] in the 30 balls with five fours kept the scoreboard moving. Kohli has Swann trapped. The captain Dhoni [35 runs, 31 balls, 3 four] and Ravindra Jadeja [26 runs, 24 balls, 2 hits] chase the remaining 7.4 overs for the sixth wicket unbeaten partnership of 65 runs in an exciting match great win. Last month, in addition to India in England ODI and Twenty20 cricket Test was soundly defeated.
Prior to the start of the toss to bat first came out, when England captain Alastair Cook [3] in the fourth over, off pacer R Vinay Kumar was trapped. The second one-day match in Delhi did not open the account. The other opener Craig Kiswetr [36] and Trott then took innings. Praveen Kumar and Vinay on Kiswetr fours in two balls after the six - sent to six runs. Virat Kohli bowled bowler Kiswetr England working on the second blow. Kohli's full-length ball from the edge of Kiswetr wickets went into bat. The team score was 53 runs for two wickets. Trott and Pietersen after the England toward the score. Kohli, hitting four on the trot his tantrums while Peterson also hit two fours in one over the bowler. India in the 16th over bowled five overs without the power play and England lost wickets added 35 runs. Peterson hit four boundaries on the master and England during the 19th over of the scores came in the 100-run mark.
Peterson on the deep backward point between Ravindra Jadeja scored four runs to be completed by a 48-ball half-century. Bangalore 59 runs against Ireland in March after the shift to the first half. Jadeja, however, had trapped Pietersen in his next over. He hit nine fours in 61-ball knock. Ravi Bopara [24] are also fortunate over the ball with his bat slip standing outside edge closer to Parthiv Patel went for four runs. The tight bowling by India. England have 36 overs batting power play. Bopara and Trott fours on the request but Bopara bowled by Praveen broke the partnership. Trott said the committee with the visiting team came close to score 300 runs. Scored two boundaries at the request of the committee at Umesh Yadav also hit two fours. Long leg area of ​​the ball, he graciously sent and then the same bowler for six runs off just 36 balls with two runs in a career full of the first half. The same over the Yadav hitting fours off the last two innings of the request sent to the last ball six. England during the last 10 overs, 91 runs, while never missed a single wicket.

JANNAT 2

Filmmaker Mahesh Bhatt's JANNAT 2 starring Emraan Hashmi and model Esha Gupta made a kick start Friday morning in the capital. First shot took place at 8:45 a.m.; on the contrary, it faced a stampede at Chandni Chowk in Delhi also on the same day and the shoot had to be wrapped much earlier to its scheduled pack-up time. The evening shoot had to be canceled and the reason is being told that a lot of people came to see Emraan when they came to know that their favourite actor is shooting at a nearby location in Delhi... In this industry only two people have created that kinda stir either Salman or Emraan. The film, directed by Kunal Deshmukh, is a sequel to the 2008 film JANNAT.
If reports are to be believed, previously named as 'INFORMER', the film is thematically similar to the prequel. JANNAT 2 is also a story about a single man's immense desire to make it big in life by any means. Arjun Dixit, the character played by Emraan Hashmi in JANNAT, was a small time gambler turned into a big shot bookie, while this time, JANNAT 2 will have illegal arms trading in the background.

Set Up verdict vigil

Pat Hughes left the bar he owns in New York City, flew across the country and showed up at 4:45 a.m. Wednesday morning to stand in line.

He wasn't trying to buy tickets to the Super Bowl or a Lady Gaga concert or shop at a holiday sale. Rather he wanted to be sure of getting a seat in a stuffy courtroom where lawyers would spend hours expounding on the minutiae of semiconductor technology.
Such is the dedication of investors in Rambus Inc, which for a decade has been fighting to prove that titans of industry conspired to steal its patents, fix prices and drive it out of business. Closing arguments ended Wednesday in Rambus's lawsuit against Micron Technology Inc and Hynix Semiconductor Inc after more than three months of testimony.
Investors such as Hughes have descended on the California Superior Court in San Francisco to watch their side do battle -- and perhaps make a last-minute trade.
"It's the David vs. Goliath thing," said Hughes, 46. "And so many of us have lost so much of our investment."
Billions of dollars are at stake. Rambus is asking for $3.95 billion in damages, which by California law would be instantly tripled, as well as unspecified punitive damages. Such an award could dramatically change the fortune of a company worth $1.46 billion in market capitalization as of Wednesday.
The company's shares often gyrate in tandem with major court decisions. For example, in January 2007 Rambus shares gained 9 percent after a favorable ruling in a case involving Hynix.
And the shares dropped 18 percent in May this year when an appeals court ruled against Rambus in a case against Micron.
On Thursday, a half dozen of the Ramboids, as company followers call themselves, set up a vigil in the marble-floored corridor outside the courtroom, waiting for the jury to return.
Jim Rockwell of Orange, Connecticut, said he has followed the company's fortunes since investing in 1999. A former software company owner, Rockwell said he was impressed by Rambus' inventions, which he believes underlie much of the hardware now on the market. "Computer memory would be so much slower if it were not for what they did," he said.
Rockwell, who also attended previous trials in California, Virginia and Washington, D.C., spent a week lining up at 6 a.m. for one of the coveted 42 seats in the courtroom. By Wednesday morning, the line stretched nearly a block, and anyone who arrived after 7 a.m. was relegated to following the online postings of the early birds.
The group shared donuts in line and many went out for dinner to pore over the closing arguments.
Lawyers for both sides focused on the reasons and the timing of the decision by the dominant microprocessor company, Intel Corp, to abandon Rambus's memory product RDRAM in favor of SDRAM, which became the industry standard.
Rambus says South Korea's Hynix and Idaho-based Micron colluded to fix prices of memory chips used in personal computers and prevent its technology from becoming widely used. It claims it lost billions of dollars in business.
Micron and Hynix argue that Rambus's chip technology was plagued by technical problems and that the company blames competitors for its own failure.
Micron attorney William Price and Hynix attorney Kenneth Nissly displayed memos from Intel and other computer companies suggesting that Rambus's arrogance had alienated its business partners. "Based on their view of the product, Rambus, and the changing market, Intel had decided not to have anything to do with Rambus," said Price.
In rebuttal, Rambus attorney Bart H. Williams argued that Intel's decision to switch from RDRAM to SDRAM came about only because it was harder to get RDRAM. "It was all about price and availability," he said.
Much of Rambus income comes from patent licensing, and it has initiated litigation against a range of tech companies. Winning patent cases makes it easier for Rambus to negotiate additional licensing arrangements.